With this writing I have to solve three very difficult tasks, all of which are up to the difficulties of accepting a paradigm shift.

With this writing I have to solve three very difficult tasks, all of which are up to the difficulties of accepting a paradigm shift.

I. On the one hand, the evolutionary approach in human sciences needs to be validated.

In biology this has been partly done (in Tibor Török: Moral and Religious Evolutionary Fundamentals), in psychology formally yes, because there exists so-called "Evolutionary Psychology", but I think this is actually just a sound title and does not follow the true evolutionary view of this trend; and in philosophy they still want to solve everything within the consciousness and the perceived possibilities,

In contrast, recent research shows that human behavior and thinking are predominantly based on life-sustaining instincts (research by Ezequiel Morsella), the role of consciousness functions as a small "switching circuit" between DNA and mind;

II. On the other hand, I have to accept my book "The philosophy of evolution", which intends to propose the evolutionary approach to philosophy, with the public;

III. And to convince public opinion of the truth of my discovery that Plato has a priori perceived the dominance of the evolutionary approach and thus created his system of idealism.