Good (right, moral) is the one who (that) supports the continuation of life; and bad (immoral) is that is harmful to the continuation of life!

Good (right, moral) is the one who (that) supports the continuation of life; and bad (immoral) is that is harmful to the continuation of life!

This is the essence of my philosophy, "The philosophy of evolution" (Actualized variation: "The generell theory of moral")

In prehistoric times, animal creatures were controlled by reflexes, but since the appearance of man, our life-sustaining instincts control us also with thoughts, that's what I call conscience.

Further, the fact that even our thoughts are dominated by the interests of survival of life is now a proven fact: research has shown that consciousness is only a kind of messenger, switch-mediating (electrical) box, and most of our control is done by our instincts.

Moreover, the fact that even our thoughts are dominated by the interests of survival of life is already a proven fact today: research has shown that consciousness is just a messenger, a switchboard (electrical) box, and most of survival control is done through our instincts.

Our DNA is approx. 90% have a structure that, according to researches, serves the linguistic communication between our instincts and our minds, and, as I add, our conscience conveys the guidance of our instincts in thoughts to our consciousness. And this is what I add to it: I think conscience (or something else), the soul conducts bi-directional communication, the knowledge flows also from the direction of our consciousness towards our instincts, our "deep layers". We feel the presence of our conscience, we experience it in every minute of our lives, it is uninterrupted to take care of us even in dreams, and this proves my earlier thoughts.

Well, if the relationship were not bi-directional, if there was no flow of information from our consciousness to our instincts, how would our instincts know what to answer in that minute and bring their answers to our knowledge through our conscience? How can our instincts respond to our behavior by our conscience if that relationship is not bi-directional and if the information does not flow from our consciousness to our instincts too?

It is the guiding principle of philosophy and is the new guiding principle, paradigm of all human sciences:

The human being is guided by life-sustaining instincts, with thoughts (and, of course, with the help of evolutionary reward feelings and feelings of guilt, but this is not the case here) through the mediation of conscience, which forms a two-way relationship between our consciousness (and deep layers of our minds) and instincts.

Indeed, the creation of God, the deity, is based on it. It stems from the fact that we feel the presence of our instincts constantly and everywhere, and their control is continuous. However, we did not know enough about them, our knowledges are still very limited in this regard at this moment.

But we are constantly feeling and experiencing in the form of joy and happiness given by our "good conscience," and in the form of anxiety and guilt, given to us by our "bad conscience", that someone or something is always taking care of us as a guardian angel-or as a god! ..

Harcz László